Internet Tax Freedom: What it is and why it matters

Reading Time: 6 minutes

The internet has changed the way we live, work, and communicate. We can access information, buy goods and services, connect with people worldwide, and even run our businesses with just a few clicks. However, as the internet has grown, so have concerns about how it should be taxed. This is where the concept of Internet tax freedom comes in.

What is Internet Tax Freedom?

Internet Tax Freedom(ITF) refers to a set of laws and policies that prohibit or limit the ability of governments to tax Internet access, e-commerce transactions, and other online activities. The concept of ITF dates back to the early days of the Internet when lawmakers recognized the need to foster innovation and growth in the nascent industry.

The first piece of legislation that established ITF was the ITF Act (ITFA) of 1998. The ITFA prohibits state and local governments from imposing new taxes on internet access or imposing multiple or discriminatory taxes on e-commerce transactions. The law was extended several times and was most recently renewed in 2016 as part of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act.

Why is Internet Tax Freedom important?

ITF is important for several reasons:

Encourages Innovation and Economic Growth

ITF helps to promote innovation and economic growth by making it easier for businesses to start and operate online. By limiting the ability of governments to tax online activities, ITF lowers the barriers to entry for new businesses, encourages competition, and creates more opportunities for entrepreneurs and small businesses.

Protects Consumers from Higher Costs

ITF also protects consumers from higher costs by preventing state and local governments from imposing new taxes on Internet access and e-commerce transactions. These taxes can be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices, which can be particularly burdensome for low-income households.

Ensures Fairness and Simplifies Tax Collection

ITF also ensures fairness and simplifies tax collection by establishing uniform rules for online taxation. Without ITF, state and local governments could impose a patchwork of different taxes and regulations, making it difficult for businesses to comply and for consumers to understand and navigate the tax system.

What is the current state of Internet Tax Freedom?

While ITF has been in place for more than two decades, there are still ongoing debates about how it should be applied and enforced.

One of the main issues is whether or not to extend the current moratorium on internet access taxes, which is set to expire in 2024. Proponents of extending the moratorium argue that it is necessary to protect consumers from higher costs and to encourage innovation and growth in the digital economy. Opponents argue that the moratorium has already hurt state and local revenue and that internet access should be taxed like any other utility.

Another issue is the collection of sales taxes on online purchases. In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. that states could require online retailers to collect sales taxes even if they did not have a physical presence in the state. This decision overturned a previous ruling from 1992 that had limited the ability of states to collect sales taxes on online purchases. The Wayfair decision has led to new state laws and regulations governing online sales tax collection, but there is still debate over how to enforce these rules and how to ensure compliance from online retailers.

What are the arguments for and against Internet Tax Freedom?

Arguments for Internet Tax Freedom:

1. Encourages innovation and economic growth by lowering barriers to entry for new businesses.
2. Protects consumers from higher costs by limiting the ability of governments to tax online activities.
3. Simplifies tax collection and establishes a uniform set of rules for online taxation, ensuring fairness and reducing confusion for businesses and consumers alike.

Arguments against Internet Tax Freedom:

1. Limits state and local revenue by restricting their ability to tax online activities, which could impact the funding of essential services.
2. Creates an uneven playing field between online and brick-and-mortar businesses, as online businesses may not have to pay the same taxes and fees as traditional businesses.
3. Could lead to a loss of revenue for states and localities, which could result in budget cuts and reduced services.

Final Words

ITF has been a critical component of the digital economy for over two decades, enabling the growth and development of online businesses and protecting consumers from higher costs. While there are ongoing debates about how it should be applied and enforced, it is clear that ITF will continue to play a significant role in shaping the future of the digital economy. As lawmakers and policymakers navigate these issues, it is important to balance the benefits of ITF with the need to ensure that state and local governments have the resources they need to provide essential services to their communities.

Read more about Preparing for a tax audit

FAQ